Women's Rights

How did mid 19th century American society react to women's demands for equality? Even though women started to have a strong movement to gain women's rights, men are still viewed as being better than women. Women still had to do a majority of duties around the house, while men went to work. Women had take care of children and dogs, make clothes, and other housework. The women also had to entertain everyone in the house as well. Laws were also set up so that women are not treated the same as men.  It was considered improper for women to speak in public, and until 1839 women were not allowed to own any property. In a majority of states it is legal for a husband to beat his wife, and women could not vote on any state in the union. These are just some of the many unfair laws that are set up by the government. Does 21st century society react differently to women and men. Personally, I feel that it is mostly equal treatment between men and women, but there are certainly some differences. For example the treatment of women and men when it comes to dating and relationships they can be seen as very different. If a man goes on a lot of dates he is considered  as more of a positive than if a women were to go on a lot of dates. A Philippines commercial shows some of these differences on how women and men are thought as in the same scenarios.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K2kfgW7708&feature=youtu.be
http://www.edline.net/files/_AIGnD_/6df91fdbe19f85633745a49013852ec4/Laws_and_Practices.pdf

Temperance Primary Source

The Inverse Square Blog. August 5, 2005. Accessed January 12, 2015. https://inversesquare.wordpress.com/2009/08/05/best-recent-save-the-planet-idea-water-use-division/

The author had no clear opinion on the event, but used the picture in his blog. The author used this picture to make a joke about water and alcohol and used the picture to grab the attention of the reader. The author isn’t very trustworthy from looking at the site, but doesn't say anything about the temperance movement that would be questionable. The picture itself is a political cartoon made promote the “Woman’s Holy War”. The goal of this poster is to try and promote other people to stop drinking alcohol altogether and to introduce people of this movement. The picture shows how strongly people tried to promote the abstinence of drinking, as well as create a force behind their ideas. The limits of the document is that it is a picture and it is limited by how people view the image. The cartoon does not give you a complete picture of the event, it merely shows the propaganda of the movement. The author does not have an opinion on the picture and does not use any supporting evidence. The author is only using the cartoon to make a joke that he came up with.    

Andrew Jackson

The essential question Is Andrew Jackson's long-standing reputation as "the people's president" deserved? Why? Why not? In a way Andrew Jackson was and was not  “the people's president" . First of all, Andrew Jackson’s Spoil system gave jobs to people who voted for him in the election and these jobs would be given out if he won. Even if this may seem beneficial Andrew had to get rid of 1900 officials to fulfill his claim, which begged the question is it better to support Andrew or to  be good at your job? Second, Andrew Jackson pushed the Native Americans off their land to farther out west so that America could expand. Many people did not like the Natives, but just as many thought that they were peaceful people which started conflict.In addition, the native americans killed some of his family members so this probably had helped to sway Andrew’s mind. Lastly, Andrew Jackson did not support the National Bank because in his eyes it gave more power to the wealthy and further increase the wealth gap. Other politicians thought that Jackson was trying to start a war between classes, while he thought he was protecting the people. This shows from different perspectives Andrew Jackson could be seen as "the people's president" ,but for the most part he did what he wanted to do which is why I don’t believe he deserves it.

Andrew Jackson Skit
Kevin- Andrew Jackson
Squiggly- Indian Chief
Mike- narrator
Mark and Sam- Indian Bystanders
Corey- cameraman
Eric- props
Narrator: In a nation, Andrew Jackson wants to expand the United States, but the Cherokee Indians are in his path. Looks into the distance.
Andrew Jackson rides his mighty steed into the scene.
Indians are mid powwow. (http://youtu.be/ZNuNsKwG1RI)
Indian chief: Hello, Jacksana.
Andrew Jackson: What does that mean?
Indian chief: Devil.
A: Why do you refer to me as such?
I: You try to take our land, demolish our people and move us west, yet before you were loyal to us. Why do you do this?
A: We wish to expand our territory. You shall move voluntarily, or you will be subject to the laws of the United States.
I: We wish to remain on the land of our fathers. We have a perfect and original right to remain without interruption or molestation.
A: Then we will have to use force.
I: The west is a mysterious place. There are other tribes there, who speak different languages. We will not fit in. If staying means dying, then so be it.
A: That is your choice.
I: We are an independent nation, we do not have to abide by your laws.
A: Yes you do.
Andrew Jackson turns to leave, rides away on horse.

The Essential questions were How should we define democracy? How democratic was the United States in the early 1800's?   We learned about the United States and their democracy through reading articles on the time period and then making a poster out of the information.

Latin American Revoultions

The essential questions that were given were “Why is it essential to acknowledge human value regardless of race? How are the events in the Latin American revolutions evidence of this social imperative? We studied the impact of the independence of classes in Latin America by reading over articles that summarized the events that occurred in the countries. After reading the summary timelines were made to show in chronological order the major events that took place while trying to become free of their classes. Each group summarized a different revolution and they each presented their findings so that everyone understood each revolution.

Between all the revolutions there were 2 major differences and commonalities. First of all, all countries were fighting against the same type of government, a monarchy. Also they were all trying to change that monarchy into a different form of government as well. The differences between the countries were that Brazil was mostly peaceful in their revolution, while Columbia was very militaristic, and Mexico was a combination of the two. Race was an issue for all three of the countries through one way or another. In  Mexico, lower groups such as mestizos and slaves revolted due to being less privileged. In  Brazil, the people didn't want their races being undermined by other races in Europe. The  people of other races than Portuguese in Brazil became suspicious when Pedro will only hire people of Portuguese descent. Lastly, in Colombia the people from South America didn't want to be oppressed by the people of  Spanish descent.

Today society has created stereotypes. This is how we judge people without really ever meeting them and it heavily affects people of different race. An example of race affecting us now is the Ferguson case. This is extremely controversial because a young black man was shot and the police officer was not charged under any account which is extremely upsetting to a large population of the country. I think that race is an extremely important part of society now, but in the wrong way. If we were to stop talking about race is the only way from not being racist because if we keep speaking about race the way we do now then people are going to continue to be racist.

http://edition.cnn.com/2014/11/25/justice/ferguson-grand-jury-decision/index.html

Ferguson news

Toussaint Louverture

Toussaint Louverture

What makes a good leader? Does he/she have to be strong, compassionate or have morals and be politically skilled? The people of Saint Domingue needed a leader and  Toussaint Louverture tried to lead the French colony. The colony is made up of a majority of slaves working on sugar plantations looked over by white landowners. The slaves greatly outweighed the population of the whites on the island and they were tired of being a slave. Toussaint Louverture united the slaves to fight the French and free them from their slavery, and he took control of Saint Domingue. Even though his accomplishments as a  military and a ruler of Saint Domingue are important, his role as a liberator of slaves is much more significant.   

As a military leader Toussaint Louverture was successfully able to untie slaves to fight against the French trying to repress the slaves and stopping them from becoming free. Toussaint Louverture was born a slaved in the island of Hispaniola and as he grew older he became a an overseer of fellow slaves in the fields.  Eventually, he rented a coffee plantation and received some slaves to work them. Later on, when the French were revolting in their own country, the same ideas spread to Hispaniola. The ideas of freedom that these French philosophers were speaking of  greatly influenced the population of slaves on the island to start a rebellion. Toussaint did his best to try and promote the slaves to fight back and in no time he had an army of 4,000 men. He taught his troops both guerrilla style warfare as well as a more traditional European style too. Him and his troops were able to successfully take control of the French Colony, Saint Domingue, but his role as a military commander was not over. Napoleon was now in power in France and he was planning to send of troops to take back the island, but Toussaint had his own problems. Hyacinthe Moyse was angry of the fact that he was using his military power to force  former slaves to go back to working on the plantations. Moyse at the time was also a military commander in Toussaint’s army and when he was given the orders to separate the “ large plantations of the north to smaller holdings” (Doc. E) he decided to revolt. This is what Moyse had done, “On the night of October 29 [1801] a revolt broke out on the Northern Plain- whites were massacred from Fort Liberte to the gates of Cap Francais….The war cry of the rebels was ‘General Moyse is with us-death to all whites” (Doc. E). In response to the revolt  Toussaint made specific people stand out among regiments to be shot, and Moyse was killed by a firing squad. Even though Toussaint in this case is seen as very harsh and cruel his abilities in war must not be overlooked. He was able to stop the most powerful military with the slaves that inhabited the island in Saint Domingue. Just because his decisions may seem unjust the fact that he was able to create an army out of the slaves working on plantations is why he must not be seen as a cutthroat or barbaric commander. However, his role as a leader and liberator of slaves is much more significant than his role as a military leader.  

Toussaint Louverture accomplishments as a ruler were what made Saint Domingue able to make themselves self reliant. WIthout Toussaint the colony would have fallen into shambles, they needed a strong leader to look over them. They needed someone to tell them they had to work on the plantations, even if they didn’t want to. The people needed to keep the sugar fields running if they wanted any chance of being their own nation. Those sugar fields gave them the blood they needed to stay alive through the income that fields provided. If no one were to tell them to work the fields then Saint Domingue economic system would collapse and the dream of an independent nation would crumble underneath them. Toussaint made the hard decisions, even though they seem wrong they were necessary. He said “As soon as a child can walk, he should be employed on the plantation to his strenght in some useful work”(Doc. D) This may seem harsh, but in the situation it was a requirement because to be able to stay independent they needed to have a sustainable economic system. This system was run by the plantations on the island  and they needed all the help they could get. Toussaint also had to keep order on the island and he did this by limiting speech and by punishing those who did not report crimes. He limited speech to hopefully stop a rebellion trying to underthrown him by questioning his means of how he rules. In addition, he set up laws that punished those who did not report crimes. This also was put in place to keep order and to promote people to turn in those who did not follow Toussaint’s laws. Toussaint was able to successfully rule Saint Domingue as well as keep order in the new independent society.

Toussaint Louverture’s most impressive feat is by far his abolition of slavery in the western part of Hispaniola. Slavery is one of the worst things a human has created. Forcing someone to work for you against their will is horrible. Toussaint was able to stop this practice by encouraging the 500,000 slave population to revolt against the 32,000 whites controlling the island. This act gave the slave population control of the island as well as making the slaves free from the whites. Toussaint Louverture lifted the spirits of 500,000 men and took and smashed their binds connected them to the whites of Saint Domingue. This freedom gives the former slaves the ability to do something with their lives, and even to make them happy. Toussaint has given them lives in which they can do what they want. They are not binded to slavery anymore. He has given freedom to the slave population and that is one of the greatest things someone can do in a lifetime. Toussaint should be most remembered for his liberation of slaves because giving freedom to 500,000 people is better than being a good military commander or a good leader. Effecting that many people so positively is by far the best way we can remember Toussaint and it gives his life the most justice. As Toussaint Louverture wrote “But today, when they have left it, if they had a thousand lives, they would sacrifice them all rather than to be subjected again to slavery” (Doc. B). This shows how important it was for these people to be unslaved. They would sacrifice a thousand lives before they would be in slavery again, which proves how much it meant for Toussaint and for the slaves to be free from their “owners”. Louverture’s most important contribution in his life is his liberation of slaves in Saint Domingue and he should  be remembered for his efforts in fighting against slavery.

Although Toussaint had major contributions as a military leader and a ruler of Saint Domingue his abolition of slavery in the French colony should be what he is most remembered for. He has done  great in his life and his harsh ruling and military commandment should not overshadow the magnificent things he has done in his life. Toussaint should not be remembered as being cruel, but as a man who freed 500,000 men, women, and children from slavery.

Document E- Madison Smartt Bell, Toussaint Louverture: A Biography, 2007

Document D- Toussaint Louverture, “Proclamation, 25th November 1801.”

Document B- Toussaint Louverture, “Letter to the French Directory, November 1797.”

Revolutions in Europe

The essential question that our class had to discuss was were the revolutions of 1830 and 1848 really failures as many historians have concluded.  The essential question is asking if any of the revolutions in Europe were a success, and the people rebelling gained something they were seeking by rebelling. To learn about the different revolutions we read through articles regarding each revolution. Groups were made for each revolution and in every group quizzes were made so that we could understand each revolution.

   The Revolution that I covered was the Frankfurt Revolution. The people of Germany were trying to create a constitutional monarchy, some of the more radical revolutionists wanted a constitutional monarchy. This Revolution occurred in 1848 and was a failure because the people revolting got almost nothing out of it. Since the King was a conservative (Fredrick William IV) he refused requests that didn't agree with his own thinking of trying to create less of an imbalance between the upper and middle classes. The Prussian military also posed a huge threat to the revolution itself and  when the King refused their offer many moved to other countries. Others were killed in the act of revolting and many went to prison. King Frederick said  at the opening of the First United Landtag in Prussia(in 1848) “No Piece of Paper Will Come between Myself and My People,” This statement shows how he was not going to budge on any of the new ideas by those who were revolting.This is a poem is by Ernst Moritz Arndt "Where is the German's fatherland? Then name, oh, name the mighty land!" The poem shows how the revolutionists want a more unified Germany that is not separated by the classes and is more balanced between the middle and upper classes.

https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/8RRSV9X

I believe that the revolutions in Europe were a for the majority a failure. The Hungary, Decembrist revolts and the  Frankfurt assemble were failures. The Decembrist revolt wanted Constantine as king, but he did not take the thrown so instead Nicholas took over the crown. The people did not like him because he was not the liberal leader they wanted. They people got oppressed by Nicholas and no positives came out of the revolution. Next, The Hungary revolution was another failure. Even though they took control of Budapest for a short amount of time Austrian and Russian forces took Budapest back over and many were imprisoned, executed or forced into exile. The Frankfurt revolution was already explained and that too was a  failure which is why I believe that the European were a failure.